Listening to learn: part one

When I first began to investigate why making Art held important information about all learning, I could only begin to predict what I  might discover. For a year I have observed at all levels, Center for Maine Contemporary Artin public and independent schools, from early childhood through high school, and in museum classes and college settings. I filled my notebooks with teachers’ and children’s own words. Their language, I expected, would give me Waynflete Art makingevidence that Art making: 1.Inspires inventive thinking, Waynflete Connections2.Invites tinkering with ideas and building vital connections, 3.Involves navigating through failure, and 4. Instills craftsmanship and high standards.

Waynflete Art makingHere are some of my initial observations that go beyond my original theory:IMG_0457

1.Teachers who are simultaneously playful and serious about learning electrify and empower their students. 2.Time is essential; if we expect children to imagine and transform materials into something novel and of high quality, we must give them time. 3.The most powerful learning occurs within a meaningful, connected context. 4.Collaboration deepens and enriches every experience, be it among students, LEAPS of Imaginationteachers, or a mix of the two. LEAPS of Imagination5.Reflection (journaling) and peer feedback LEAPS of Imagination(critique) deepen one’s understanding during every learning process.

Last week I came across a piece written by English teacher, Sophia Faridi, who’d traveled to Helsinki to see what made Finnish schools tick.

I was struck by what she had to say.*  The attributes for which the Finnish public schools are known are the same observable characteristics present when we teach thinking through Art. Take a listen to what she had to report.

1.Finns value play because they believe that kids learn from exploration. 2. Students have adequate time (15 minutes for every 45 minutes of teaching) to indulge in what interests them. 3.Schools emphasize real learning and inquiry, and teachers don’t forfeit time for standardized test prep. 4.Until fourth grade, teachers base student assessments on how students learn, and do not give grades until later. 5.National standards exist (like our Common Core), yet teachers have the autonomy to impart them as they see fit. 6.Finns place a high value on collaborative learning, both among teachers and students. They design spaces to stimulate shared interaction.

There’s much more to come on why teaching Art is simply about good teaching. I welcome your thoughts.Feedback interchange

Nancy Harris Frohlich

 

 

*In her article  from Education Week and the collection logo                                                                       Faridi also reveals that: 1.Finnish teachers go through rigorous research-based training programs and come to teaching with post-graduate degrees. The system recognizes that if teachers are overworked they will not be happy or effective. They have planning time at home and reasonable work loads. 2.Society puts its faith and trust in its teachers, and in turn, teachers trust their students. 3.Neither Finnish teachers nor schools are evaluated nor compete with one another.

 

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Listening to learn: part one

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s